.)
MAY 23 2008

1. Karl Rove subpoenaed, Att'y asks why?
2. Rove subpoenaed again
3. Google Search on "Rove subpoenaed" produces over 230,000 hits
worldwide
..............................................................................................................
Karl Rove subpoenaed, Att'y asks why?
by Mark Silva of chicagotribune.com

"It is unfortunate that Mr. Rove has failed to cooperate with our
requests," Conyers (D-Mich.) said in a statement today. "Although he
does not seem the least bit hesitant to discuss these very issues
weekly on cable television and in the print news media, Mr. Rove and
his attorney have apparently concluded that a public hearing room
would not be appropriate."

"Unfortunately, I have no choice today but to compel his testimony on
these very important matters," Conyers said.

In light of Conyer's reported remarks for the need for "someone'' to
"kick his ass,'' Rove's attorney, Robert Luskin, wrote to the chairman
this week, he is "not the least bit confused about the committee's
motives or intentions.''

<link to source>
...................................................................................................................................................
Rove Subpoenaed Again
By Dan Froomkin Special to washingtonpost.com

The House Judiciary Committee yesterday sent former White House
political guru Karl Rove a new subpoena to add to his document
collection....

But there seems little doubt that Conyers will run into the same wall
that has thwarted his Senate colleagues. The day Rove was
supposed to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee, he didn't
bother to show up. And the White House made the extraordinary claim
that he has absolute immunity from congressional oversight. As I
wrote in my Aug. 2 column,
Karl Rove's Immunity, the law does not
appear to support anywhere near such a broad assertion.
Traditionally, courts have recognized that the president's right to
confidentiality must be balanced against Congress's legitimate
oversight needs. But no matter. The White House asserted it -- and
the Senate folded.

<link to source>
....................................................................................................................................................
Google Search on "Rove subpoenaed"  
__________________________________________________________________________________________

Sponsored by Friends of Don Siegelman  2007
<feedback>________________________________________________________________________________
__________
.........................................................................
Enter Get up to speed fast!Find out who Don Siegelman really is.Meet the people who played a role in the prosecution.What can you do to help? Find out here.Get in touch with us.
You need Java to see this applet.
Home page for the Media Archive concerning Don SiegelmanPress and Media before 2008Press 2008Press 2009Last Month's PressThis month's and recent press
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is posted without profit for those who have expressed interest in this
information for research and educational purposes. DonSiegleman.org has no affiliation whatsoever with the originators of these
articles nor is DonSiegleman.org endorsed or sponsored by the originator(s).

"Go to ..." and "more" links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as
originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted on this site may not match the versions our
readers view when clicking the "Go to Original" links.
.........................................................................
.........................................................................

SEE the DOCUMENTS!

FAX: Karl Rove's Lawyer
<link to .PDF file>
Letter: House Chairman Conyer
<link to .PDF file>
Subpoena: Karl Rove
<link to .PDF file>